Category: Articles & Essays


Written by Eric Anthony Crew

“The Oddities of CERN” is the  about all of the strange events surrounding the LHC’s rise to power. From attempting to recreate the Big Bang by creating mini-black holes on the infamous December 21, 2012 date to a showdown with certain Maya spiritual leaders, all the way up to today’s attempting to contact another parallel universe. The Large Hadron Collider has had its work cut out for it, and is exceeding expectations at every obstacle.


As if the fact that CERN planned on completing one of their definitive tests for the God Particle on December 21, 2012 wasn’t strange enough, lets take a look at each of the strange events that lead up to this date before continuing to the latest, possibly life altering news that has developed.

I will first start with the wisdom and concerns of the Maya Spiritual Leader Ac Tah:

“Both the Hopis and Mayans perceive that we are approaching the End of a World Age in 2012.  In both cases, however, the Hopi and Mayan elders do not prophesy that everything will come to an end –rather, this is a time of
transition from one World Age into another.

Mayan Spiritual Leader – Ac Tah

“The years since 1992, up to 2012, are ones of big changes in the planet’s vibration, and ours as well,” says Ac Tah.

“Our ancestors calculated one Baktun (20 years) of the energetic instability, where the energy of Earth and the human body would grow slowly, but at the same time, in a very fast way.”

The solar wind has a lot to do with it. The solar winds come in at the Earth’s North and South poles creating the aurora borealis, also known as geomagnetic storms. The Mayans see even more Sun activity up to and after 2012, which will change the electromagnetic field of the Earth. And when this changes, we change too.”

“Already there’s more consciousness to care for the Earth, animals and other human beings,” says Ac Tah. “There’s talk of energies coming in that changes us. Some people can control it, but many don’t know what to do with this energy – it can lead to being diagnosed with a mental imbalance.  We can expect more intensity in 2011, so get ready. It’s time, he says, to purify the body from toxins and negative emotions.”


 As Ac Tah began to look into the consciousness imprisonment aspect of those in control over world affairs, he became extremely troubled to discover the ]the Large Hadron Collider in Geneva was meant to recreate the moment of the “Big Bang”. Perhaps most unsettling of all was that it’s definitive experiment was supposed to be on the infamous date December 21, 2012; a date with enormous significance to his people.

Remember: "Days numbered 13 are high-energy days and also time to end projects in a frantic final burst. (December 21, 2012 is the 13th day of the Maya calendar system)."

Maya Numerology Correlation? “Days numbered 13 are high-energy days and also time to end projects in a frantic final burst. (December 21, 2012 is the 13th day of the Maya calendar system).”

Aside from the many fears (some founded, most not) toward CERN’s undertaking of the 2012 mission to “discover the God Particle”, the scientists admitted that they simply didn’t know what would happen or how this would play out. Would it create a black hole on the same day that civilization was supposed to die off in a massive blockbuster movie setting or would it show us the elusive particle that would supposedly answer our questions about the Big Bang?

At the original time of writing this, evidence proving CERN was actually conducting experiments on the 2012 date was inconclusive, as the only site that discussed this was from the LHC’s own website admission which stated the following:

Screen shot 2012-12-16 at 2.27.33 PM

Screen captures from the LHC’s website.

However, if we click on the “Timetable” on the Menu to the left, we are taken to the three days and it details every action on the 19th and the 20th and yet on the 21st a curious thing happens; nothing is mentioned but the time table they will be conducting “tests” or experiments.

The time they are using will be ending at 11:00 (remember how the exact alignment on this date was said to begin at 11:11 GMT).

Here is the details of the agenda for the 21st according to LHC’s website:

Screen shot 2012-12-16 at 2.26.12 PM

Whether or not these scientists actually discovered Higgs Boson on that date remains up for debate, but what happened next was revealing that something big may have actually happened with the Large Hadron Collider in addition to discovering the “God Particle”.

The CERN project was shut down just before December 21, 2012 and then an even more curious event happened, despite having supposedly needed to close, they announced “a milestone” discovery and was soon awarded a seat at the United Nations.


A break-down of some of the very real concerns and oddities about this ongoing experiment:


  • Recreating the moment of the Big Bang has unknown consequences.
  • Strangelets and the construction of strange matter destroying our planet within seconds (still a fear by many scientists to this day).
  • Creating a micro black-hole capable of imploding the Earth.
  • The very real fear of generating enough energy equivalent to several thermonuclear explosions.
  • Outside of the CERN building is a 13-foot bronze statue of Shiva the world destroyer


    Shiva is said to destroy each world in order to recreate a new one in an endless “cycle” of chaos, creation, and destruction. As if having a statue devoted to the Hindu God weren’t enough, CERN actually allowed an dance-opera to film a strange preview of its show inside the CERN laboratory and debut it on VIMEO.

    The title of the movie and show is called “Symmetry“, but many people have called it CERN’s Shiva Dance of Destruction film.

    This film is incredible, I highly suggest watching as it is both visually and emotionally stunning.

    The accompanied documentary ’Symmetry Unravelled’ by Juliette Stevens, shows what the ideas are behind the project and brings forth physicists and artists sharing their perspective on each other’s discipline.



Whether or not CERN was targeting South America remains unknown as there is not enough concrete evidence to support Ac Tah’s entire theory, however his video testimony below is compelling and interesting enough to watch.

Here is Ac Tah’s description of what will happen come December 21, 2012 (including his accounts of CERN and their intentions).


“The Maya were aware that time is infinite and could be counted to infinity, however they left us a calendar up to the year 2012 to leave it to our generation to commence a new count, in the light of a new spiritual awareness.”” Ac Tah




Both CERN and its website have been publicly shut down on December 19, 2012, offering only that they have made a “milestone discovery”, interestingly enough. Immediately people began questioning; did they discover the God particle?

Did they make contact with something as many people have postulated? Or were the experiments simply too  dangerous and needed to be shut down?

One thing is for sure; the guys at CERN have a messed up sense of humor.

First Shiva, now a seemingly obscure, “Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy” reference, but in context of the upcoming power date (December 21, 2012) and it’s impending “countdown”; we are left to wonder if these guys are trying to help spread the fear or if they just have a weird sense of humor with poor timing?

Here is the picture on their site:


(Image: CERN)

The final beam of the three-year proton run at the LHC is dumped, with the phrase “So long and thanks for all the fish” from the control team.

This morning CERN teams brought the first proton run at the Large Hadron Collider to and end with the message, “So long and thanks for all the fish,” – a phrase made famous by British writer Douglas Adams in his Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy series. The remarkable first three-year run of the world’s most powerful particle accelerator was crowned by a new performance milestone. The space between proton bunches in the beams was halved to further increase beam intensity and the accelerator’s luminosity.

“So Long, and Thanks for All the Fish is the fourth book of the Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy “series” written by Douglas Adams. Its title is the message left by the dolphins when they departed Planet Earth just before it was demolished to make way for a hyperspace bypass, as described in The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy.”

Or, was this a double entendre meant to say “so long” to the Age of Pisces? It is unfortunately not very well known yet that the Age of Pisces actually ended on December 21, 2012 _ as I explain in my next article, “The Age of Aquarius &  The Precessional Consciousness”. But one would have to take into consideration that these men and women know science and astronomy (as well as science fiction references), so my guess would be this is intentional double-talk to suggest that they were both pulling our leg about 2012’s doomsday theories and also paying a strange homage to the end of an aeon. Even after three years, questions persist.


Interesting to Note: The similarity of the CERN LHC structuring and the mayan glyph for the “Galactic Tree” or 8 point crossing of the Earth’s equator, the Galactic Equator, and the Sun’s ecliptic or apparent path along its revolution of the center of the Galaxy.



The Higgs Boson particle was finally confirmed (and the deserving scientists responsible received the Nobel award), much to the amazement and delight of scientists and physicists everywhere (least of all Professor Higgs, himself). But where is this discovery leading us and more importantly, what did uncovering it truly mean to humanity?

Some believe that when the scientists at CERN discovered the God Particle they were contacted by beings from either outer-space or from newly accessed parallel dimensions.

All science fiction novel theme aside; is there any credence to any of these theories and what would that mean for our future?

First let’s listen to an explanation of what a Higgs boson particle is, as well as why it matters so much that we found it.


Inferring to the level of importance such a discovery means to the world, shortly after revealing the discovery of the Higgs Boson particle, CERN was given a permanent seat at the UN.  Just after the 21s of December 2012, the General Assembly of the United Nations in New York granted CERN permanent Observer status, the only science organization to acquire this prestigious status.

This should be enough to show the importance of this discovery, both to the realm of quantum physics and to the world at large. But what does the LHC scientist’s observer position mean?

“CERN already engages in a several relations with the United Nations and several of its agencies. The presence of CERN, an intergovernmental organization, as a permanent Observer at the UN General Assembly is a natural step forward. “Our presence at the Assembly was felt to be so natural by everybody that the Organization’s sign and seat were prepared before the formal adoption by the General Assembly and were made available as soon as the positive vote actually took place,” says Maurizio Bona.

The UN and its agencies are involved, in different ways, in many fields of science, technology and innovation, as well as in education. With the recently updated and more effective institutional relationships, CERN hopes to strengthen and broaden its contribution to various ongoing UN initiatives. As an example, in the coming months CERN is planning to contribute to the implementation of ECOSOC’s 2013 theme, “science, technology and innovation, and the potential of culture, for promoting sustainable development and achieving the Millennium development goals”.

“Several of the United Nation’s initiatives are happening in areas where CERN has no Member States,” says Maurizio Bona. He concludes: “The seat at the UN Assembly is not a static throne but a privileged position that will open new doors for us to reach a wider audience and raise awareness about the scientific world and its positive influence on society in a more global community.”



Speaking about the United Nations, if they were preparing the world for more life-changing discoveries, either related to the discoveries at CERN or otherwise; we would expect to see evidence of their plans in the years surrounding this discovery.

Not to disappoint, in late 2011 the UN created a new ambassador title; the very first “Space Ambassador” just in case we suddenly make contact with peaceful beings. Sound crazy? Not to the UN.

“The continued search for extraterrestrial communication…sustains the hope that someday humankind will receive signals from extraterrestrials,”  The Australian quoted Othman as saying. “When we do, we should have in place a coordinated response that takes into account all the sensitivities related to the subject. The U.N. is a ready-made mechanism for such coordination.”

The publication also quoted Professor Richard Crowther, a specialist in space law and governance at the U.K. Space Agency, on Othman’s suitability for the job: she “is absolutely the nearest thing we have to a ‘take me to your leader’ person.” – Source



Although the seat for The United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs  seems to have been a natural, albeit preemptive move, we also have the odd case of the current Pope Francis and his seemingly out of place statement of wanting to baptize an alien baby.

He said Catholicism was a church of “open doors”, and that it was up to Christians to accept the Holy Spirit however “unthinkable” and “unimaginable” it appeared.

Describing how, according to the Bible, Peter was criticized by the Christians of Jerusalem for making contact with a community of “unclean” pagans, Francis said that at the time that too was “unthinkable”.

“If, for example, tomorrow an expedition of Martians came to us here and one said ‘I want to be baptized!’, what would happen?”- Source

Some people suggest these statements were made simply to show his radical sweep toward a newly promoted acceptance at the church, whatever the intention the statements left more people confused than not, and left the topic wide open for debate.


The LHC consists of a 27-kilometre ring of superconducting magnets with a number of accelerating structures to boost the energy of the particles along the way. Inside the accelerator, two high-energy particle beams travel at close to the speed of light before they are made to collide. The beams travel in opposite directions in separate beam pipes – two tubes kept at ultrahigh vacuum. They are guided around the accelerator ring by a strong magnetic field maintained by superconducting electromagnets. The electromagnets are built from coils of special electric cable that operates in a superconducting state, efficiently conducting electricity without resistance or loss of energy. This requires chilling the magnets to ‑271.3°C – a temperature colder than outer space. For this reason, much of the accelerator is connected to a distribution system of liquid helium, which cools the magnets, as well as to other supply services.


The science community seems in a rare agreement, that this is a big moment for all mankind and a huge leap forward in understanding the cosmos. But many are still cautioning that this could be just the beginning.

Dr Roberto Trotta, Lecturer in Cosmology at Imperial College London, has this to say, according to the Science Media Centre.

This could be just the first step towards uncovering a completely new layer of reality – the Higgs might lead to the discovery of supersymmetry: the notion that for every known particle there exist a super-particle with a much larger mass.

And if supersymmetry is real, then we are on our way to finally crack the mystery of the dark matter in the Universe. Dark matter might be ‘the last Highlander’ of all supersymmetric particles, the only surviving ‘sparticle’ from the Big Bang. And we might be on the verge of hunting it down at the LHC.

Professor John Womersley, STFC Chief Executive, said:

“Obviously having found a new particle, there is still much, much more to do at the LHC – we need to confirm that this new particle is the reason some particles have tangible mass while others are insubstantial – as proposed by Peter Higgs and other scientists, who predicted that a previously unknown particle must exist for our current understanding of the Universe to work.”


“If dark matter does exist, it was produced at the time of the Big Bang (like all other matter). For scientists to figure out what kind of matter was produced at the big bang, they try to create conditions like that of the Big Bang. The closest we an get to replicating those conditions is at the point where protons collide inside the LHC. And the faster they can make protons collide, the closer they are to mimicking the temperature of the Big Bang.

Why does the LHC need so much more energy for its new set of experiments?

“It all comes down to E = mc2,” said physicist Josh Thompson, speaking with the Swiss Broadcasting Corporation last year. The “E” in Einstein’s equation, of course, stands for “energy“ — the LHC has previously run at 8 TeV (tera electron Volts). After this upgrade, the LHC’s “E” will be 62 percent greater at 13 TeV.

When we get more ‘E’ we can hopefully get more ‘m’ [mass] stuff coming out,” continued Thompson, pointing out that the increased energy will allow not only more mass but also heavier particles — the kind of particles that may prove the existence of dark matter.

Astrophysicists tell us that the matter we can detectgalaxies, stars, planets, comets, people, cosmic dustcomprise only 5% of the universe. The other 95% consists of dark energy (about 70%) and dark matter. We know essentially nothing about dark matter, except that physics and math indicate it must exist — just as scientists though the Higgs boson particle must exist, though it hadn’t been detected before 2012.

“Dark matter is a real problem in physics today. It’s one of the big puzzles,” CERN physicist Dave Charlton told the Swiss Broadcasting Corporation this month.

We don’t understand what 95% of the universe is made of. We know from astronomical observations that there is dark matter in the universe – probably five times as much as the normal everyday matter that we can see. So what is it? We don’t know. One very good possibility is the theory of supersymmetry, which predicts that dark matter is due to particles that we should be able produce at the LHC.” – SOURCE




CERN plans on leaking gravity into newly discovered parallel universes in hopes of making contact; or did they already?

One Possibility is that CERN could have discovered parallel universes and the gateway to these dimensions, according to a new paper published in the physics journal, Modern Physics Letters B.

In a new paper published in Physics Letters B, Ahmed Farag Ali, Mir Faizal, and Mohammed M. Khalil explain that the key to finding  may come from detecting miniature black holes at a certain energy level. The detection of the mini black holes would indicate the existence of extra dimensions, which would support string theory and related models that predict the existence of extra dimensions as well as parallel universes.

“Normally, when people think of the multiverse, they think of the many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics, where every possibility is actualized,” Faizal told “This cannot be tested and so it is philosophy and not science. This is not what we mean by parallel universes. What we mean is real universes in extra dimensions. As  can flow out of our universe into the extra dimensions, such a model can be tested by the detection of mini black holes at the LHC. We have calculated the energy at which we expect to detect these mini black holes in gravity’s rainbow [a new theory]. If we do detect mini black holes at this energy, then we will know that both gravity’s rainbow and extra dimensions are correct. –  Source



Much like the statements of the LHC when I first began this article over three years ago, CERN’s Large Hadron Collider is scheduled for final completion on its projects later this year (2015).

The internationally renowned project has captured the imaginations of the world over. Yet, the fears appear to be just as prevalent now as they ever were, and according to many; just as real.

Speculations of the intentions of these experiments now range from more plausible explanations such as author William Henry‘s theory that CERN is opening wormholes, to more outrageous ones like that of opening a portal into hell itself.

The collider’s power has been more than doubled now, and it will have many times more power than any other comparable facility in the world, and with that power comes many other unknown potentials toward an infinite number of unknowns.

A top official at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) says that the titanic machine may possibly create or discover previously unimagined scientific phenomena, or “unknown unknowns” – for instance “an extra dimension”.

“Out of this door might come something, or we might send something through it,” said Sergio Bertolucci, who is Director for Research and Scientific Computing at CERN, briefing reporters including the Reg at CERN HQ earlier this week. – SOURCE


If CERN is successful in making contact with alternate realms, we would open the Pandora’s Box of realities, some of which could be so far from our scope and imagination that it begs the curious mind to continue paying attention to what comes next.

Part of the discovery or in its vast possible revelations, could also help confirm or once another well respected theory, or help put it to rest; the idea of a “Big Bang” that started the Universe. If recent discoveries in quantum physics are any indication, time is an ever-flowing part of creation itself, and not a byproduct of the moment of creation.

But we can only wait it out and see, perhaps with a renewed interest in concepts we thought were only possible in the realm of science fiction. Life has shown us that it is both miraculous and continuous, as has our evolving consciousness that attempts to explain it all.

Who is to say what, if any, limits there are of our understanding; that our consciousness may continue to ascend through the generations and years of experiments so that we may someday be even a fraction more aware of how it is our Universe actually works, and perhaps even greater; what it all means.

-Eric Anthony Crew



Check out my next few articles, as part of a series concerning the beginning of the Age of Aquarius and it’s effect on consciousness:

  • Telling Time – The Maya’s Long Count & The Precession of the Equinox
  • The Age of Aquarius – The Precessional Influence on Consciousness
  • The Hopi Prophecies


    Here is a short video of Oppenhiemer (clearly distressed) has to say about comparing the destructive impulses of man (in setting off the atomic bomb) and comparing it to the actions of Shiva – the World Destroyer

    “We knew the world would not be the same. A few people laughed, a few people cried. Most people were silent. I remembered the line from the Hindu scripture, the Bhagavad-Gita; Vishnu is trying to persuade the Prince that he should do his duty, and to impress him, takes on his multi-armed form and says, ‘Now I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds.’ I suppose we all thought that, one way or another. ” -Oppenheimer




Police State USA:

How the NDAA & Illegal Gun Laws Paved the Way For Chicago’s
“War Zone”

By Eric Anthony Crew

AP Authors Note: Having lived in Chicago for 3 out of the last 5 years I have to add that none of this is particularly new, just alarming in its numbers. Yet as many in the city would point out; this is nothing too surprising considering the numbers of impoverished that live in the ghettos of Chicago as well as the growing number of both the unemployed and the current rise in inflation will only make things worse before they get better.

There is also very real evidence to support the effects of summer on crime rates in Chicago, for some need only to walk outside to consider how the rise in temperature directly impacts and increases the rate of crime and subsequently murder rates in Chicago.

In this segment (a first of three) I hope to detail the history of how Chicago fell into this predicament and then how this is being used as the model for the rest of the United States and what would happen if gun control and Fear tactics are allowed to supersede the last of our constitutional rights.

Screen Shot 2014-07-12 at 4.46.04 PM

Welcome to the Beginning of the End of the United States and Say Hello to Police State USA.

Military Response to Chicago Shootings Sets New Precedent

Let us first remember, this is the model for what happens when you let the government strip you of your right to bare arms (aka the 2nd Amendment) was put into place to protect the people from a potentially tyrannical government first and foremost, but also from the possible violence of others. Without this Constitutional right in place, those that obtain their firearms illegally (which as the numbers below will show has only increased since firearm prohibition) have a severe and extreme advantage over citizens that cannot protect themselves.

In Chicago the record shows the desire to bare arms was increased by the government’s prohibition which in turn created the “need” for the black market, as it manifested due to supply and demand as it has with any other society in history under these circumstances. If you follow history it tends to repeat itself in this regard and unfortunately always gets worse; for then the government steps in and makes this a military issue.

Mayor Rahm Emmanuel has called on the assistance of the United States military to help patrol the blood-soaked streets of Chicago. The unprecedented move is one step away from declaring total martial law in the nation’s third most populous city.

This is bad, since Obama declared the United States to be a “battlefield” as of signing the NDAA (National Defense Authorization Act) on January 1, 2012 he now has the ability to place standing armies on American soil as well as the authority to indefinitely detain any American citizen without due process. The result could very well be any American voicing opinions to be labeled dissidents and considered Enemies of the State.

During 4th of July weekend, 82 people were shot in an 84 hour period, with a total of 14 succumbing to their injuries. Though the number of murders has fallen drastically since the 1990′s, the violence in Chicago seems to be increasing dramatically.

“It’s groundhog day here in Chicago again,” Police Superintendent Garry McCarthy said this morning, in a statement that touched on the violent weekend. “The results were a lot of shootings and a lot of murders unfortunately,” he said. “Yesterday was the day that really blew it up for us in our strategy.”

With their failing strategies to protect the public, city officials will now go in a different direction and call upon the services of the National Guard. The U.S. military will act as a liaison for the Chicago Police Department and will not be given free rein to enforce the law, at least at this moment. The city, which has been given the nickname “Chiraq” because of it’s violent present, will now see increased police presence and armed guards in dangerous neighborhoods.”

Screen Shot 2014-07-12 at 2.15.39 PM

Do Gun Laws Work? Crunch the numbers yourself. “Chicago Police Superintendent Garry F. McCarthy announced Chicago Police have seized more than 3,390 firearms to date in 2014.”

The disconcerting number of guns seized and the even higher average number of gun related violence in Chicago can now be shown to be a  result of the ineffectual prohibition along with the increasing number of impoverished and unemployed.

We should ask ourselves then, why is this city being cited as the example for why more strict gun laws to be put in place?

Let us continue this examination next by listing the demonstrably Unconstitutional laws and acts the Obama Administration has participated in since taking office in 2008. For a reference to each act, please click on the underlined words (to follow tab indexed link) to obtain the information needed to make an even judgement for yourself on the path we have allowed our country to walk as well what that will ultimately mean for our future and our children’s future in America.

Continue reading

The War on Consciousness & Modern Warming

To understand the history of global warming is to understand the cycles of the Sun as well as to understand and observe the impedance of deceitful legislation on human development, proposed since the days of Margaret Thatcher, that would cause further hinderance to the wellbeing of humanity and the ecology alike. Do not get tricked into supporting legislation that will continue the lies and avoid the real truth of the matter; the current state of extreme weather and warming is caused by the Sun and not by trace gas elements.

A war on the consciousness is another way of saying there is a war on the perception of the way we see our Earth, as well as the Universe that surrounds it; which greatly impacts the wellbeing of all life on this planet and causes a great detriment in the physical and mental development of the human race.

the sun from space

Weather Wars Part 1: A Look Into The Facts & Fallacies of The Global Warming Fraud
By Eric Anthony Crew, originally written September 2011

By now everyone with a television or computer is familiar with the terms “global warming,” “going green,” and of course “carbon emissions,” but what do these words actually mean?The theory of global warming reaches as far back as the 1880’s according to historical record.  The natural conclusion of climate specialists was to factor in the impact of human evolution on the changing of the climate, but belief in this theory requires the omission of important data that must be incorporated to better understand the entire scope of this topic. The Earth has been in a cyclical pattern of heating and cooling for millennia and we need to look no further than our nearest star for the proof. The problem of global warming is not that we need to create more laws and restrictions, rather that we need to revise the entire structure of how we view this issue and its source cause.

The hypothesis of global warming began as one of many uncertain scientific hypotheses, specifically stating that the burning of fossil fuels would increase the CO2 levels in the atmosphere which would in turn enhance the greenhouse effect. The greenhouse effect was then calculated to create an exponential increase in temperature if CO2 emissions continued unimpeded. This hypothesis was regarded as unfounded for almost a hundred years in the scientific community because the original calculations from the 19th century indicated that the average global temperature should have risen more than 1° celsius by 1940, which did not happen.

As Prime Minister of the UK in 1979, Margaret Thatcher returned the hypothesis to the public and attempted to make it a major international policy issue. This issue would set the tone for years to come for all aspiring politicians, whether they believed in the theory or not, so as to not appear weak on protecting the environment. However, her reasons for doing so have come into scrutiny, as the 2008 ABC documentary, “The Great Global Warming Swindle” has described in great detail. Her position was a reflection of her political affiliation’s goal to endorse nuclear programs without international backlash. The way to accomplish this task was to alter the public perception of nuclear technology, which the UK’s Conservative Party desired for ulterior reasons. After the General Elections of 1979, the majority of the coming Cabinet members were former members of the government that lost to the campaigns sanctioned by the National Union of Mineworkers in 1974. The returning politicians sought then for any excuse for reducing the power of the coal industry and their forerunners. A solution came in the revelation that coal-powered stations gave off CO2, whereas nuclear power did not. Global warming contributed the perfect excuse for reducing the UK’s dependence on coal by replacing it with nuclear power.


That industry’s large nuclear processing facilities were also required for the proposed upgrade of the UK’s nuclear weapons program, which the rival Labour Party vehemently opposed. Yet, after the accidents at Chernobyl and Three-Mile Island, public opinion of nuclear technology was severely damaged. That and the privatization of the UK’s electric industry, which held stake in coal remaining the dominant energy source, disclosed the fact that nuclear electricity cost four times more than UK coal-fired electricity. Thus, global warming became the only remaining excuse for the unpopular nuclear power facilities needed for nuclear weapons.

Therefore, Mrs. Thatcher and her associates created the Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research, and the newly appointed councils were encouraged to place priority in garnering climate-related research. The Hadley Centre persisted as an influential component to this movement and later developed into the well-known and respected IPCC, or International Panel of Climate Control. All of the research and data compiled by these scientists have been funded directly from the government via public taxes. With economic systems beginning to wane, research funding began to lose importance to the public, but global warming remained as an important concern of  the world’s leading governments. Therefore whenever monetary support was needed, politicians would include fearful references to global warming if possible to scare the public into acceptance of further funding.

Understanding the history of global warming’s political influences is an important factor in balancing the views on how society should deal with legislation concerning waste and pollution. Superficially, the essence of global warming was an issue of environmental protection and saving the earth, and so the environmentalist and conservationist movements also began to endorse the effort to stop CO2 emissions. Public opinion was swayed from fear based rhetoric and thus man-made global warming was now the most influential international political topic of debate. The possibility of potential risk became undisputed “facts” in the form of proposed legislation to restrict CO2 emissions. It wasn’t until the Kyoto Summit in ’97 that we would see America truly jump aboard this issue, alongside UK political champion Tony Blair in proposing actions to have nation states commit to the limitations.


The outcome of these legislations resulted in serious economic damage. The industrial and economic growth of any nation requires an abundance of available energy supply and whatever obstructs the supply and usage of energy will then reduce the economic exploits it is based upon. The governments were pressured to reduce their “carbon footprint” to nearly half of their emissions averaged in 1990.

However, there are those that believe that man is not the main cause of this change. To verify this claim, the rise and fall of atmospheric carbon dioxide levels as well as temperature change need to be observed and cross-examined with each hypothesis. Records of atmospheric levels of CO2 since 1940 show a continuous rise, but during this same time the global temperature decreased until 1975 when the temperatures began to rise again.  All models of greenhouse effect suggest a temperature increase indicates warming will be at its greatest for a given location in the troposphere and at its lowest near the surface of the earth. However, both NOAA and NASA’s websites release graphs showing that current satellite and weather balloon data do not support this model. Instead these empirical findings show that the surface warming rate is greater than or equal to the rate in the lower troposphere.

Another part of the theory of green house effects suggest that the Earth’s temperature will change in accordance to the increase or decrease in CO2 levels, however details released by NASA indicate data for the complete opposite. As the Earth cools the oceans begin to absorb carbon dioxide, and as the climate warms the oceans release carbon dioxide. Although because of the very large mass of the world’s oceans, it takes hundreds of years for global temperature changes to register with the oceanic mass. Thus, studies conducted by scientists at drilling stations in glaciers, such as the Vostok station, show changes in the level of atmospheric CO2 follow changes in global temperature at around every 800 years. This does not fit the government and media endorsed postulate that our recent Industrial Revolution is the cause of climate change.


To fully comprehend what comprises the theory of green-house effect we must also understand the catalysts for the argument, namely what CO2 really is and does. Carbon dioxide accounts for only about 0.054% of the Earth’s total atmosphere. The Earth’s atmosphere is but only one part of the total Biosphere, or all of the areas of living and non-living organisms within the Earth.  According to the American Institute of Physics, humans are responsible for less than 1% of that, or around 6.5 gigatons of emissions each year. While that number may sound staggering, these numbers pale in comparison to the 150 gigatons of emissions caused by other plants and animals annually. Decomposing leaves produce even more, volcanoes more than double the average emissions caused by man, and the ocean remains the largest producer of emissions in history. Therefore, collectively analyzing the data thus far indicates that man-made emissions alone cannot be causing global warming.

Even with all of this data being available to the public, there is still a majority of opinion that wants to believe in the notion that man is responsible for a sudden change in our global climate.To get a better idea of why this is, we must return to the panel of scientists that evolved from Margaret Thatcher’s Hadley Center, now known as the International Panel of Climate Control, or IPCC. By using the data findings released by the now infamous, “Fourth Assessment Report’s Working Group I Summary for Policymakers,” we can assess the opposition to this theory and where the relative science has led them. The report, which has been referred to in nearly every piece of global warming legislation since its release in 2007, finds that it is “very likely” that emissions of heat-trapping gases from human activities have caused “most of the observed increase in globally averaged temperatures since the mid-20th century.”

The United Nation panel, the IPCC’s “Fourth Assessment Report’s Working Group I Summary for Policymakers” combines certain scientific understanding of global warming and then predicts what the climate changes will be in the future if not maintained. The Working Group I included the input of more than, “1,200 authors and 2,500 scientific expert reviewers from more than 130 countries.”  The report concludes that it is irrefutable that Earth’s average temperature is rising exponentially, stating that it is proven from what is “now evident from observations of increases in global average air and ocean temperatures, widespread melting of snow and ice, and rising global mean sea level.” The report also concludes that the two most important heat-trapping gases, carbon dioxide and methane, “exceeds by far the natural range over the last 650,000 years.” Finally naming that the industrial revolution is the prime source for the start of this cycle which is “very likely to have been unprecedented in more than 10,000 years.” Other important points expressed by this report claim that 11 of the last 12 years rank among the 12 hottest years on record and that in the last 50 years, “cold days, cold nights, and frost have become less frequent, while hot days, hot nights, and heat waves have become more frequent.”


This is all very compelling information if only examined in itself, especially if not double-verified which is what is supposed to be attempted in accordance to the Scientific Method. To re-examine the above claims by the IPCC, we should also evaluate their disclaimer made directly under the aforementioned information. The scientists, after quite a lot of controversy in the refutations of certain findings, decide to create an addendum for their use of the word “likely,” even going so far as to create a graph of what “likely” entails. When the IPCC associates the word “likely” to a scientific finding, the term is merely a reflection of a specific range of certainty as defined by a chart on their own homepage, therefore it is not a Universal truth if they create the definition of their information.

To dissect the data released by the IPCC was a complete career killer for both politicians and scientists alike, whom would receive no further support if public statements or questions were made. This continued until the release of the leaked emails and subsequent book entitled, “Climategate,” by Brian Sussman. The “Documents” folder in the enormous data-file released by a whistleblower within the IPCC contains many segments of computer program code used by the IPCC that indicates intentional doctoring of the Climate Research Unit’s global temperature series. The data-file also contained a 15,000-line commentary by programmers concerned that the code and the data used by the scientists were fabricated to substantiate their original hypotheses. In one section titled “seldom-tidy code,” the immense number of filtering, processing and altering programs used on the raw data is unsettling at the least. Alterations that were so blatant included the removal of proxy data that inadequately correlated the measured regional temperatures, and even showed a complete replacement of proxy data altogether with forgeries to conceal the discrepancies between what the proxy data actually showed and what the IPCC wanted it to show.

Within the emails, The team’s programmers even admitted that they were artificially adjusting or “correcting” the proxy data from tree-rings. In the “tech world,” a programmer’s comment following data produced by mathematical algorithms is usually preceded by the statement “REM” for “remark,” indicating that the text on the line following the word “REM” should be ignored by the data collector that compiled the research at a later time. One of the remarks most often included in the program fragments disclosed by the whistleblower stated, “REM Uses ‘corrected’ MXD [proxy data from tree-rings] – but shouldn’t usually plot past 1960 because these will be artificially adjusted to look closer to the real temperatures.” Even going so far as to continue by saying, “These will be artificially adjusted to look closer to the real temperatures.” These are statements made by the authority on the subject of global warming, with an admission that the data are being routinely tampered with for the sake of making the proxy data comparable to the instrumental temperatures.


In one of the most revealing and controversial emails leaked, Professor Phil Jones of the CRU wrote to the authors of the highly popularized “hockey-stick” graph used in many arguments supporting the global warming hypothesis like the documentary, “An Inconvenient Truth.” In the emails the authors of this graph, Michael Mann, Raymond Bradley and Malcolm Hughes, admitted to falsely abolishing the medieval warm period to continue with current beliefs. Professor Jones wrote, “I’ve just completed Mike’s Nature trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years (ie from 1981 onwards) and from 1961 for Keith’s to hide the decline.” These are statements made by the chosen experts on the subject of global warming, showing they are at least perverting their findings, which is fraudulent and should be addressed as such. It is disconcerting to think of all the time, energy, and money that has been wasted just to support hypothesis that, when examining every supporting claim, falls short and even contradicts itself.

The National Academy of Sciences report reaffirmed the existence of the Medieval Warm Period between 900 A.D. and 1300 A.D. and period that followed called the “Little Ice Age” of around 1500 to 1850. Both of these periods occurred long before the invention of the sport’s utility vehicles or the industrial activity that could have possibly impacted the Earth’s climate. In fact, current research shows that the Medieval Warm Period saw the Earth to be much warmer than today and going so far as to claim the Vikings even were able to grow crops in Greenland.

The manipulation of public opinion and funding aside, there has been some positive changes that have occurred thanks to this global myth. People have become more responsible in their daily contribution toward the pollution of our planet. Even though our carbon emissions are not enough to cause the claims of catastrophic and irreversible events, it only benefits the Earth and it’s inhabitants to limit our waste potential. We all share the same air, water and earth on this planet and would be wise to continue to understand that there is always a reaction equal to or greater than the cause of an event. Yet that does not merit the manipulation of the world’s citizens into believing a theory for the sake of legislation and carbon taxes alone.

There are over thirty-one thousand scientists that disagree with the UN’s global warming claims by the Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine (OISM), released by the National Post, which proves once and for all that this is not a view shared only by an uneducated populace. In fact, each of the 31,000 scientists have signed a petition rejecting claims of human-caused global warming. The claim by most media-fed propaganda that only a “few conspiracy theorists” refuse to believe in the myth of man-made global warming completely contradicts the “31,072 Americans with university degrees in science – including 9,021 PhD’s” that signed the petition. The world needs accurate reporting on scientific claims, as well as accountable representatives as the figure heads for the experts that we are to rely on. By allowing legislation to be passed based on faulty, inaccurate and intentionally misleading information we are allowing ourselves to be manipulated into whatever laws will best suit the political endorsers of this claim.


The world now needs new representatives and experts to trust, ones that will base their new research on all of the sides of the issue and without the omission of data that detracts from proposed taxes. By revising our view on the cause of global warming, from the byproduct of the dangerous machinations of man to that of a cyclical process inherent in nature, we will be creating a future free of fear-based propaganda and misinformation. Mankind should continue to limit his contribution of detrimental pollution for the betterment of all living creatures and not for the propositions that will end up only benefiting of a handful of wealthy elitists. The Earth will continue to have cycles of rising and falling temperature and CO2 and in discovering this to be fact we need to correct our perspective regarding our personal impact on global warming.

Now that the political history has been explained we can continue the examination with Part 2 of “The Weather Wars – The Chemtrail Experiment” before ending this 3 part series with the evidence for the actual cause of global warming and cooling; the waxing and waning of the cycles of the Sun in the article, “It’s The Sun Stupid! How Solar Cycles, Solar Flares, & CME’s Cause the Extreme Weather on Earth”, (a semi-literary response to the Bloomberg Businessweek propaganda article, “It’s Global Warming Stupid!”

Eric Anthony Crew


AP UPDATE: Free EBook/PDF Downloads


Screen shot 2013-06-07 at 9.23.53 AM

Click The Above Picture to Download A Copy of Daniel Crew’s, “Man Made Global Warming? Watch Your Wallet!”

Of the reference material used; the first and most inspirational for myself was when reading my father’s short paper entailing the nearly laughable sciences behind Global Warming. This paper inspired the above essay, available for free download is Daniel Anthony Crew’s “Man Made Global Warming? Watch Your Wallet!

“Today’s global warming is part of a natural 1,500-year, plus or minus 500-year, solar cycle operating for at least a million years. The Earth’s climate has warmed and cooled nine times in the past 12,000 years, in lock step with the waxing and waning of the sun’s magnetic activity (Science 2001;294[7 December]:2130-2136). Over the last 1,200 years there has been a “Medieval Warming” (900-1300), when Greenland was green; a “Little Ice Age” (1300-1850), when New York harbor froze, and people could walk from Manhattan across the ice to Staten Island a mile away (in 1780); and the current global warming (1850-?). Rather than “global warming,” a better term for this phase of the solar cycle is “Modern Warming.” Since 1850, temperatures have risen 0.8 degrees C, most rapidly in 1850-1870 and 1920-1940. Temperatures in the 1,500-year solar cycle fluctuate within a 4 degree C range – two degrees above and two degrees below the norm.

The Modern Warming is not confined to this planet. Mars, Jupiter, Pluto, and Triton (Neptune’s largest moon) in the solar system are also warming.” – Daniel Crew

Screen shot 2013-05-16 at 12.29.24 PM

Click the above picture to download a free copy of, “Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!”

The scandal that blew the lid of the “science” behind this global scam. Indisputable proof these scientists have been faking evidence for years. A must have and as always, free to download from my 4Shared page here, “Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!

Large PDF Breakdown of Time Table for Climate Gate Events

Click to download – Large PDF Breakdown of Time Table for Climate Gate Events


Click to download – Large PDF Breakdown of Time Table for Climate Gate Events


Screen shot 2013-06-07 at 2.41.56 PM

Shredding the “climate consensus” myth: More Than 1000 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims – Challenge UN IPCC & Gore



“On November 17, 2009 some 3,000 e-mails, software files, and other documents from the University of East Anglia’s Climatic Research Unit were covertly released onto the Internet. In his November 28, 2009 article “Climate Change: This is the Worst Scientific Scandal of Our Generation,” Christopher Booker summarized the far-reaching ramifications of what was exposed in these emails….”


Causes of global temperature changes during the 19th and 20th centuries


Global Warming Is Media-Hyped Hysteria
by James M. Inhofe. At Issue: Is Global Warming a Threat?


April 21, 2011 marks the one-year anniversary of the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) First Light press conference, where NASA revealed the first images taken by the spacecraft.

In the last year, the sun has gone from its quietest period in years to the activity marking the beginning of solar cycle 24. SDO has captured every moment with a level of detail never-before possible. The mission has returned unprecedented images of solar flares, eruptions of prominences, and the early stages of coronal mass ejections (CME’s). In this video are some of the most beautiful, interesting, and mesmerizing events seen by SDO during its first year.

“We check the main predictions of the climate models against the best and latest data. Fortunately the climate models got all their major predictions wrong. Why? Every serious skeptical scientist has been consistently saying essentially the same thing for over 20 years, yet most people have never heard the message. Here it is, put simply enough for any lay reader willing to pay attention…”

“The lips of wisdom are closed, except to the ears of Understanding” — The Kybalion.

As I work to complete my first book, “The Truth About Everything,” I have have begun to read many ancient texts and legends in order to uncover the ontological truths that, due to the obfuscation of the origin of man and our true history, has mainly survived through a type of veiled verbal symbolism, known as esotericism.

The exoteric teachings are better known as the “outermost layer/surface level” that is taught as the verbatim “word of god”, which is the official way of preaching most of the world’s Judeo-Christian influenced theologies and is therefor not allowed to be challenged or questioned in anyway for it is not up to individual interpretation.

This is how most mystery schools of ancient societies ensured only the those steeped in enough esoteric symbology were able to follow their “illuminated” teachings; which contained everything from the philosophic nature and ontological origin of man to the dates of the equinoxes and solstices which in turn assisted in crop production and proliferation of civilizations through elevated communication (or consciousness).

Through the intentional changing of language throughout history, the origin of man has become just as veiled as the esoteric texts that are ascribed to them; take this into consideration while reading an excerpt from Manly P. Hall’s, “The Secret Teachings of All Ages”, (a classic in esoteric hermeticism).

After first introducing a general background for Thoth, in his many characters and representations throughout history, I will conclude this segment with my own esoteric interpretation of these texts.

Continue reading

Conscientious Agriculture

Conscientious Agriculture

Eric Anthony Crew

(UPDATE: Now contains link to download free copy of “The World According To Monsanto” here.)

An essay examining the misuse, misapplication and misinformation pertaining to science of agriculture.  By  Eric Anthony Crew

Allow yourself a moment to conceptualize a pesticide strain so powerful that we could easily eliminate the need for any new chemicals to be developed. Such a world would no longer have the bothersome insects that eat our fruits, and our gardens would remain free of predators or gopher holes that irritatingly thread themselves throughout the soil. But what are the implications of undertaking these actions? Rachel Carson, author and founder of the conservationist movement, answers this question in her article, “The Obligation to Endure,” by saying that if we are to continue to kill so many life forms indiscriminately, we should expect the very real possibility of human extinction. This is because of what these chemicals are and how long it takes nature to react to its use and misuse.  The misapplication of these dangerous chemicals creates an imbalance in nature that will end up devastating all of Earth’s life forms if we do not step in and start the process of checks and balances in this generation.

The deadly pesticides and herbicides that are constantly used today are creating a chain of death that continue for years after they are applied and have far reaching detrimental affects that are often not taken into account as a whole. In this civilization deemed the “information age,” we neglect to heed the warnings of numerous specialists that often tell us the very same message, that we are killing our world at a rate that will leave nothing but destruction for our future generations. The nature of the beast we call man is to change its environment so radically and swiftly that nature has had to learn to adapt itself to us, which, by all accounts is relatively new to the external factors that influence the evolutionary process. Carson’s article gave a detailed abridgment of the agricultural development of pesticides, herbicides and even other toxic pollutants that began to sprout up just before her time in the early 1960’s. While many could argue that an article written decades ago would likely have little to no relevance for today’s booming agricultural-based society, after reading her concise points most readers are left wondering why these problems are still around today.

With the advent of any dangerous chemical also comes the possibility of its proliferation, a consideration that appears lost on most individuals that use them. The side-effects from the spraying of pesticides have become such a constant in our mass-production of agricultural goods, that most people fail to even recognize when they are occurring. These chemicals deposit into the soil and later reach our insect and animal life, gallivanting its way from organism to organism only to eventually show itself in our water, air and food supply.

To better understand how we could end up destroying ourselves by the very creations we use to subdue other living creatures, it is necessary to investigate what these pollutants actually do to our environs. The chapter entitled “Environment Pollution” from the book, Chemistry: Foundations and Applications,gives a broad overview of these pollutants are and how they affect the world. Environmental pollution is the release of chemicals or chemical byproducts that cause harm to the wellbeing of the ecology and environment. These pollutants are often divided into certain categories: H20, atmospheric and soil pollutes, which are then listed as either organic or inorganic in nature . Toxicology is the study of effects of poisons on the human body. The main assertion of toxicology states that the dosage of certain chemicals determines the overall effects and postulates that just about any chemical at high dosages are dangerous for the cellular development of any living organism (“Environment“).

Even with all of these factors now coming together about the use of pesticides and the link to toxicity and death, many people still remain unconvinced that there is a need for immediate change. However, what is not often considered is to what level these pesticide and herbicides are already ingested, breathed and lived in within our daily lives. People just assume that governments and corporations will not be constantly poisoning ourselves along with the world just to make money. It is this assumption and the negligence of observing just how deeply these pollutes have become ingrained in our world that will be our undoing.

A perfect example of how blind we have become to the overuse of these chemicals and how embedded they are in our lives is by looking at the insertion of pesticides and herbicides into the genetic makeup of the very food we eat. Certain companies have decided to combat the pest problem to the extent of modifying their crops on a wholly different level by the manipulation of genetics. Ana Campoy of the Wall Street Journal reported on a historic chemical-company merge in her article, “Seed Giants Join Forces; Corn Made by Dow, Monsanto to Fight Insects and Weeds.” In accordance to the agreement, the companies will collaborate on a seed that combines “eight different herbicide tolerance and insect-protection genes into top-performing hybrids for the most complete control ever available.” The finalized creation will be protected against any threats from both above and below the soil. Monsanto and Dow agreed to pay royalties to each other for any seeds they sell using the other’s traits. Campoy reported on Monsanto’s reaction to this, “It’s an environment where you can add things you wouldn’t have independently and create new products that the industry would not have seen,” said Carl Casale, vice president of operations for Monsanto. Campoy also continued by writing Andrew Liveris, the Dow Chief Executive’s commentary concerning this rousing new agreement, “This is game-changing technology… When you put in a couple more genes, unexpected things can happen.”

If it weren’t bad enough that these chemicals are inherent in the soil we use and the air we breathe, now we must also ingest them at the genetic level. As stated earlier with the theme of toxicology, any exposure in abundance to these poisons will negatively affect living creatures. These chemical giants are even admitting that they do not know what will happen from the merging process nor are they offering any studies of these new chemicals to alleviate any concerns.

The fact that the government is lacking a responsible effort to study the long-term effects of these inventions is alarming to say the least. In fact, the only available studies of the long-term effects of these chemicals is in its aerosol form. The Food and Drug Administration states that they have been working diligently to reduce the pesticide residue in the imports from other countries caused by these aerosol sprays. According to the article, “Scaling Up Political Ecology: The Case of Illegal Pesticides on Fresh Vegetables Imported into the United States, 1996-2006,written by Ryan E. Galt, states that the adherence to the regulations of food and pesticidal residue creates a major health concern for the entire agricultural world. The main points of the article are that domestic vegetables have lower adverse residues than that of imported products, and that there are 14 main pesticides from an allotted 476 testable chemicals make up more than two-thirds of all violations (Galt).

Now it is clear that there is not only a continued use of these dangerous toxins, but also that there is an actual level deemed safe for ingestion based on region and country. Each of these factors still remains isolated from each other, however, when looked at by specialists trying to decide how to regulate certain aspects of chemical production and use. Keeping in mind that farmers have been dealing with pests for thousands of years without the help of such potent forces, it becomes a question then of why humans are so arrogant to think that we can continue to use these products without worry of any eventual effect on ourselves, let alone the rest of the world.

The answer can be found in the lack of proper media coverage on the use of these chemicals, especially concerning the implementation of genetically modified organisms. After looking into what the word GMO actually entails and researching the topic further, we begin to get a bigger picture of why there are so many citizens that are wholly unconcerned about the subject. The website, GMO-Compass,tells us that there is a necessity for these particular developments in the scientific community, especially concerning agriculture and the supply and demand of its consumers. Such developments proposed as necessary for humanity to advance, include the invention of genetically modified organisms, or GMO’s. GMO-Compass effectively describes the laws, definitions and history of genetically modified organisms to the average consumer. The site, financed by the European Union itself, suggests that the coexistence of GMO products and natural or organic products are a necessary and pertinent part of our society’s future (GMO-Compass).

The American conglomerate Monsanto, created GMO’s with the genetic predisposition to be completely unaffected by  the use of certain pesticides, namely its own product Round Up. These Round Up-Ready organisms actually contain a protein developed from a virus cell that the FDA claims is similar in nature to the proteins that humans have ingested for millennia. If you are to look at the reports of said hypotheses, you may be hard pressed to find one that isn’t paid for by the company itself. The benefits then appear to be only for the company’s profit and production of seed; which also carry with it a unique genetic coding called the “Terminator Gene,” in which the scientists have actually devolved the crops from being able to reseed themselves annually after the fruition of the crops. This means that the farmers would have to return to Monsanto year after year for the ability to have such “pest-free” crops.

The idea behind GMO’s originated in the mass production of certain staple foods to be developed for the hungry and starving Third-World Countries, which actually called for the “deregulation” of the years of testing the effects of these organisms on human life. If you were a politician in the 80’s and even into the Clinton administration of the 90’s, you were practically considered a heretic for suggesting such tests to be conducted, these processes of which have been part of the Scientific Method for centuries. Yet after more than twenty years of application and development the notion that these creations were for the feeding of the hungry seems to have mysteriously vanished. These countries are still lacking food resources and our developed countries have actually been projecting results of over-production. If it were truly the intention for these products to assist these nations it is clear now that something that went terribly wrong along the way. It appears that the corporations would rather continue to globalize and create profit than to assist in helping humanity rid itself of the pestering element of hunger.

Returning to Rachel Carson’s “Obligation to Endure,”we are reminded to look at the bigger picture, to imagine how we will leave the future and our generations of children that will have to deal with nature’s adaptation to our maniacal inventions. Perhaps then it is not unwise to suggest that the Bill of Rights be amended to include protection of our citizens from such obviously harmful chemicals and even radiation. At least insofar as to give us the right to opt out in the vote booths as to whether or not these chemicals should be used.

At this point it is unknown as to whether or not the processes described by Carson and others are completely irreversible, but it would be wise to consider the notion that we are all part of this world and are therefore subject to the changes this world will make in reaction to us. To sum up Rachel Carson’s warning is to recount a quote by Jean Roosted, the man that inspired the name of the New York Times excerpt; stating, “the obligation to endure gives us the right to know.” If the leaders of this world want to create a responsible society in our augmentation of health, the right to know and the right to vote in these processes must be made into a necessary part of our societal evolution. Otherwise the use of toxins sprayed on our food, in our air and in the genetics of the products itself will continue to deposit the poisons into everything we know until it all becomes too much for life to continue.

Eric Anthony Crew


Links to check out…


“There’s nothing they are leaving untouched: the mustard, the okra, the bringe oil, the rice, the cauliflower. Once they have established the norm: that seed can be owned as their property, royalties can be collected. We will depend on them for every seed we grow of every crop we grow. If they control seed, they control food, they know it — it’s strategic. It’s more powerful than bombs. It’s more powerful than guns. This is the best way to control the populations of the world. The story starts in the White House, where Monsanto often got its way by exerting disproportionate influence over policymakers via the “revolving door”. One example is Michael Taylor, who worked for Monsanto as an attorney before being appointed as deputy commissioner of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1991. While at the FDA, the authority that deals with all US food approvals, Taylor made crucial decisions that led to the approval of GE foods and crops. Then he returned to Monsanto, becoming the company’s vice president for public policy.”

“Thanks to these intimate links between Monsanto and government agencies, the US adopted GE foods and crops without proper testing, without consumer labeling and in spite of serious questions hanging over their safety. Not coincidentally, Monsanto supplies 90 percent of the GE seeds used by the US market. Monsanto’s long arm stretched so far that, in the early nineties, the US Food and Drugs Agency even ignored warnings of their own scientists, who were cautioning that GE crops could cause negative health effects. Other tactics the company uses to stifle concerns about their products include misleading advertising, bribery and concealing scientific evidence.”


The Botany Of Desire
One of my absolute favorite documentaries.

“Are we controlling nature or is nature controlling us? Michael Pollan reveals his view with four examples: the apple, the tulip, cannabis & the potato.”


The Looming Gap in Human Spaceflight

A Review of NASA’s Abandonment of Human Spaceflight

by Daniel Anthony Crew (April 23, 2008)

America abandoned the moon in 1972, halting our nation’s human space exploration effort in mid-stride, even though congress fully funded, and NASA completed the development of the flight hardware necessary to conduct one more trip to our only natural satellite. Our national political will to continue exploring beyond the blue world of Earth drifted from our collective conscience as the Cold War began to crowd out all other priorities.

The Shuttle Program did not begin test flights until a full four years after the Apollo Program ended, a gap that caused many of NASA’s finest minds to seek careers elsewhere, bleeding the imagination from research and development efforts that were spawned and accelerating during this era. R&D that has affected virtually every product we use today. The loss of our will to explore beyond low earth orbit in the 80’s and 90’s, and the dispersion of our technically brilliant Apollo space team, is one major cause of a decline noted in the US technological competitive edge over the last 40 years.

Our nation faces another gap in human spaceflight. The Shuttle Program will end in 2010, culminating a program phase-out that started in 2007 – shedding vital commercial vendors, contractor and support tiers along the way. Not to mention its human capital (to borrow a NASA term – for its people). The requirements to develop hardware for the new Constellation Program’s Orion Crew Exploration Vehicle and Ares I launcher started this year – with estimates of 2014-2017 before the US can deploy its own Astronauts, use Mission Control and training assets in Houston, or roll-out a Constellation Program space vehicle from the launch facilities in Florida. Another hiatus in U.S. human access to space.

Even if the new Administration and Congress attempted to reverse the course of the Shuttle’s demise, say in the first quarter of 2009, too much of the program support structure could not be reinvigorated without pouring billions back into qualifying new vendors and hardware. A very unlikely event since every billion spent on Shuttle is a billion reduced from the startup budget of the new Constellation Program. In simple terms, NASA is currently not funded well enough to be able to afford the two programs simultaneously and, as a consequence, will face the second gap in its short history.

NASA’s entire budget is less than one cent of every federal tax dollar collected – roughly 15 billion dollars per year. Of that amount, 5 billion dollars per year is used for the Shuttle Program. To fund the Constellation Program an equal amount of Shuttle dollars must ramp down when Constellation dollars ramp up. It is a zero sum game of 5 billion discretionary dollars per year. Approximately the same amount that President Bush has committed – 30 billion tax dollars – to fight global HIV/AIDS (through PEPFAR) during the timeframe that America’s human space program will be grounded.

A relatively small contingent of scientists and engineers (compared to the current Shuttle workforce) will develop the Orion crew vehicle and Ares I launch vehicle during the four to six-year gap, a time during which American astronauts will fly to the space station totally dependent upon Russia, Japan and Europe. In essence, we are sending our human space program offshore – relying on other nations to maintain a minimal presence in space – following the lay-off of an estimated 5,000 scientists, engineers, and technicians in California, Texas, Alabama and Florida. A workforce that is a powerful technical source for US commercial products and academic initiatives and spinoffs. Arguably one of the few governmental entities that most Americans agree provides tangible results and clear benefits to society.

Leaders of America’s top high-tech and aerospace companies signed a joint challenge to Congress, imploring the return of U.S. space access to NASA and its contractor workforce, not those of foreign lands. This is especially important considering the very nations we must rely on during a program gap are clearly challenging US leadership in space, and, in the case of China, access to space. It is important, if not vital for long-term U.S. strategic interests, that our own political leaders heed the cadre of top American aerospace leaders to adequately appropriate discretionary spending at a level that will eliminate the possibility of a human spaceflight program to program gap.

The combined voice of American voters can make the difference to insure our most important U.S. space program assets – scientists, engineers and technicians – do not gravitate away from NASA by necessity, diluting technical potential for decades. To avoid this pitfall we must saturate Congress and the Administration with a demand to restore US access to space to the US space program and its workforce.

Continue reading

The Truth About 9/11

“All truth passes through three stages.

First, it is ridiculed.

Second, it is violently opposed.

Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.”

— Arthur Schopenhauer


Continue reading

The Philosophy of Stoicism

History, Application & Relevance to Today’s Generation

Continue reading

%d bloggers like this: