Advertisements

Tag Archive: eric anthony crew


The Contemplations Series – A Modern Application of Philosophy 

Contemplations of Greatness

There is a driving force each of us feels inside that pushes us toward greater things. Some people find this motivation easily, while others struggle to find the energy.

We are each aware at some level of that nagging sensation we get when we begin to feel of your dreams slipping away. Since this feeling comes from something within us, is it something that each of us can discover and use to our benefit?

Look within and you may discover that the exact same sensation that drives you can also be used to transform your life into the one of your dreams.

Sometimes this push can at first come from others, seeing the flame of potential in yourself and wanting to see you do better. But to truly reach this potential, it has to be a conscious choice to want to do better.

In philosophy, there is something known as an internal drive, created by an element of our individual destiny.

This drive is called our entelechy, better known as an awareness of your full potential from your actual present state.  Aristotle believed that our destiny is driven by our entelechy and that entelechy is the essential part of what drives our development, from cellular to emotional and physical systems.

Our entelechy pushes us toward growth because personal growth is only attained after introspective reflection is conducted, without judgement.

Discernment, patience and an ability to be honest with yourself are all virtues needed so that one day you may seize your own moment of greatness.

If you are struggling to reach your own level of greatness, you only need to reconnect with yourself to find your own way. If you search your heart long enough you will find that drive, your inner entelechy, and you will know what you need to do for yourself to reach your potential. Most likely you already know the greatest impedance on reaching greatness is your greatest enemy, your fear of yourself.

Fear of failing or anxiety over certain achievements can cause a lot of self doubt, but these too should be met with an impartial eye. Otherwise, you will only continue to hold yourself back.

Ask yourself, “Why am I so afraid of trying?”

We can become very comfortable with ourselves as we let our dreams slip past us like the night sky. But one day you will wake up and realize what dreams you made a reality will either be your demise or your own ascent to greatness.

If you let your dreams die out of fear of your own potential, you’ll never know what could have been. It would be like buying a fireworks display that you are too afraid to fire. You can imagine how great and spectacular the lights could have been, but the grand finale never happens. Not without a choice.

Imagine how many beautiful lights and dazzling displays are never shown because of self doubt?

Ask yourself the question and be ready for the answer.

 

Am I holding myself back from reaching greatness?

If your answer is yes, find the strength to look into your psyche and be able to detach yourself from your emotional reactions through what you witness during this process. Not all of what you discover about yourself will be pretty; but the aversion you feel is created by that same energy that is compelling you forward, toward greatness.

Go with that feeling, go with the aversion.

That which plagues you or makes you feel uncomfortable should be confronted. This will be hard and is the exact opposite of how we are normally wired to react to things; but there is a reason to go toward the pain, rather than away from it.

A reward.

When you find the sensation of anxiety or something that makes you feel uncomfortable  about yourself, you are finding the source that drives you. Your entelechy.

Go with the pain.

If you do you will find something miraculous. Not only will you reconnect with your inner drive and find that motivation toward greatness. You will find a strength has grown in place of your pain and you are a different person because of it; and that alone is a feat of greatness worthy to be proud of.

 

Eric Anthony Crew


“Character cannot be developed in ease and quiet. Only through experiences of trial and suffering can the soul be strengthened, vision cleared, ambition inspired and success achieved.” _ Helen Keller
Advertisements

The Philosophy Contemplations Series

635937653771787106-1975277221_6.-compassion.jpg

Contemplations of Empathy

 “God sells us all things at the price of labor.” ~ Leonardo da Vinci speaking not so cryptically about the law of karma. In all aspects of life, you get what you put in.

When I was growing up, I had quite a hard life and yet I was always told that it will get better. “Don’t worry,” someone would assure me, “it will get better.”

Even my mother, the amazing soul she is, could see the suffering that I was going through and would try to make a promise she knew she could not keep by telling me the same. But for some of us, life won’t necessarily get any better; and depending on your mindset, that might not actually be a bad thing.

There is a certain type of miracle in simply being alive, and at our present time with such a wealth of information available at our fingertips. Anything and everything that our curiosity demands appears available, streaming even. With so much capacity for gaining knowledge in today’s society, ranging from the spiritual to the mundane, it truly presses the notion that each of us incarnated at this particular time for a particular lesson to be learned.

bt-against-empathy.jpg

One way of looking at life is that the more experience a person has, the more opportunities there are for each individual to actually learn from the lessons they were meant to, which in turn enables the growth their soul actually incarnated for, (it sounds a lot easier than it is apparently).

There is this beautiful concept in Eastern Philosophy called Wu Wei, while Taoist in nature, Wu Wei offers a rather stoic perspective of life that I often use to help myself understand the changing energies around me. Wu Wei literally translates the the action of non-action. Or what you are doing when you are doing nothing. This is basically a concept to get you to understand that first without action, there is still action being taken and those actions are your thoughts _ which in turn is the only thing we have under our full control over in life.

Heraclitus explains the natural evolution of the concept of Wu
Wei rather well with his infamous quote, “You can never step into the same river twice.”

Is the main concept trying to be put forth is that nothing remains the same and the only thing that remains constant is the flux.edb585c95bfdf4fd03275a24af54818c

This flux is basically that ever-changing push of life that takes our unrealized potential toward something new, for better or worse depending entirely upon our actions and intentions.

A large part of why I am so grateful for all that has transpired in my life can be attributed to the idea and philosophy continuing from the notion of flux.

When I look back in remembrance of everything, I have to smile and enjoy all of it because they were my experiences to have had. All the loves I burned so brightly for; all the amazing individuals that have crossed my path; the immense struggles that taught me vigilance through the strife; and especially the intense pain that gave me the strength to rise above it all.

Without the struggle, the beauty of our paths would fade in its importance. Yet, thanks to the Laws of Karma (in return for my reactions to this struggle), I was given a great gift of empathic wisdom.

deeply-disturbed.jpg

What is empathy? And what does being an empath or having a strong sense of empathic guidance mean?

Understanding empathy and what the difference is between empathy and sympathy is a good way of understanding a lot of the issues stemming from the many different personality types there are out there, which in turn stems from each person’s unique interpretation of reality.

There is only one reality, but with each sentient being capable of their own observation, there are also equal amounts (so likely infinite amounts) of interpretations of the one reality.  And as I showed in article, “The Current Shift in Consciousness“, scientists have learned from observations such as “The Double Slit Experiment” that we really do impact the reality around us simply by observing it. Thus, each of us truly co-creates all that we live and see, and strangely enough, a lot of what we don’t see as well.

Empathy is the phenomenon that occurs when one person triggers an empathic reaction in another based on a mutual understanding coming directly from a certain kind of connection that goes far beyond language. This is a physical, as well as an electrical reaction, one that can even be seen on the EM spectrum and is in actuality caused by a chemical response  in the heart. What some people call our “heart consciousness“.

Having a heightened level of empathy helps connect beings from an understanding of having physically, emotionally as well as spiritually having experienced something individually that connects each person to that same energy of that experience.

These are emotions dealing with a preternatural sense of knowing and feeling thing that a completely different person is feeling and knowing, simultaneously. Somewhat like the metaphysical equivalent of the soul’s emotional deja vu, but reality is not contingent upon our acceptance of its connectivity, it is merely colored by it. Neither is our awareness of any of this.

med_thumb_empathy_cropped.jpg



Sympathy
is more of a psychological reaction to something, the difference of empathy and sympathy in this regard would mean you are dealing with a spiritual and emotional reaction (empathy) versus one solely based on the logic of cause and effect (sympathy). At some point as well in our contrasting of these two terms, we are perhaps simply only dealing with a certain level of vernacular, or how people choose to word things.

But in terms of an empathic versus a sympathetic reaction to something you are typically dealing with an (feminine/yin) emotional versus (male/yang) logistical reaction.  Knowing the difference between these two types of reactions and when to apply them can be very beneficial knowing which reactions are better suited to which problem or unexpected life event.

An example of a sympathetic reaction would be that a teacher feels bad that he has to fail a student that he likes based on his test scores, but the student did not do well enough on his test for a passing grade. The teacher exhibits a healthy level of sympathy in feeling bad for the student, but (using the male dominant logic of cause and effect) logically the teacher understands that the student and the teacher are both merely obliging to the structure and rules of their pedagogy and that an emotional or empathic reaction probably wouldn’t benefit the situation.

empathy3.jpg

 

Resigning yourself to the fact that the only thing that ever really stays the same is change, allows a certain kind of complacency which helps to align your mind with the power of the Now, which is in turn just the feeling and act of being completely present at that moment in time.

So in essence, it is we that must adapt to that concept that change is not only imminent, but necessary. Which is the same as realizing that you, yourself, are causing your own disappointments in life and could very well be holding yourself back from creating experiences that could change your life profoundly.

Life truly is an expression of your thoughts, which are in turn a half-step of the actions you will take, all of which end up reflecting your character, soul and purpose in life.

Remember that every intention has a purpose; but ask yourself; whose purpose are you serving? And are you ok with that…? If so, then you are in a beautiful place because no one can take that away from you; you are free.

Eric Anthony Crew

empathy.jpg

 


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l7AWnfFRc7g&feature=youtu.be

Bestselling author, political adviser and social and ethical prophet Jeremy Rifkin investigates the evolution of empathy and the profound ways that it has shaped our development and our society. Taken from a lecture given by Jeremy Rifkin as part of the RSA’s free public events program..


 


 

8182wd4N-2L

THE SECRET TEACHINGS OF ALL AGES: “An Encyclopedic Outline of Masonic, Hermetic, Qabbalistic and Rosicrucian Symbolical Philosophy By Manly P. Hall First published in 1928, this volume includes fifty-four stunning full-page color plates by noted artist J. Augustus Knapp, and two hundred black and white illustrations from rare occult works and manuscripts. To this day it remains unrivaled in its scope, synthesis and graphic beauty; a must for any serious student of mystical philosophy.”


 

The Secret Teachings of All Ages

A Breakdown in Esoteric Symbology

Today we are going to dissect a seemingly benign lithograph from one of my all time favorite books and gems of pure if not hidden knowledge, “The Secret Teachings of All Ages” by Manly Palmer Hall. Contained in a dense amount of space, hides many secrets ready to be found by the trained eye. You can obtain you own copy for free from my 4shared page by clicking here. Enjoy!


tumblr_mh057onmgH1rmqkkuo3_1280


Hidden in this picture are layers of symbols, stories, and archetypal knowledge concerning cosmology and the cycles of life and consciousness that is influenced by The Great Year, to use Plato’s term,  a natural cycle of approximately 26,000 years of counter clockwise rotation of viewpoint from the Earth (called the Chandler Wobble) which is caused by the physics of the Hollow Earth and the gravitational pull of the Sun(s). As it is true we live in a Binary Galaxy.

In the famous lithograph, we can see the story of our local Universe, the Milky Way Galaxy, and its precessional cosmology (our cosmic origins and in this particular case, it’s cyclical function) displayed through celestial anthropomorphization; which means giving human or animal characteristics to the movement, consciousness, and the behavior of the sun as it travels through each of the 12 constellations.


1431912934

The truth of the famous da Vinci painting is laid out properly in terms of astrotheology which is displayed in esoteric teachings which at its root is the language and science of symbology.


The ancient Zoroastrians had 12 Heavenly Gods. In Judaism there are the 12 tribes of Israel. The Greeks depicted 12 gods on Mount Olympus. The son of god known before Christ as Mithras also died on the cross and was depicted with 12 disciples (signs of the zodiac), leading to today’s solar messiah Jesus whom was also said to have had 12 disciples. Joseph, the early prototype of Jesus found in the Old Testament, was 1 of 12 brothers. Muslims list 12 ruling Imams following Muhammad. Odin had 12 sons in Norse mythology. There are 12 stations in the Wheel of Life in Tibetan Buddhism. There are 12 houses of the astrology chart, which directly correspond with the 12 constellations. The significance of the number 12 can be seen and felt throughout history.


12-tribes-or-sons-of-jacob1

The 12 tribes of Jacob and their astrological signs, corresponding to each of the 12 sons Jacob was said to have.


mithras-and-his-12-apostles-signs-of-the-zodiac

Mithras, the Bull Slayer (From the Age of Taurus) depicted with his 12 disciples or 12 signs of the zodiac.

This is why the number 12 is rife throughout most theologies, Christianity especially, as the newly anthropomorphized solar deity (the sun or “gods son”) Jesus the Christos (meaning the anointed or ascended one) travels about after the initiated age of 32 (some versions say 30 or even 33 but the meaning remains the same, all adepts go through similar tests at that age throughout time and mystery school successions.

From the 32nd Degree of the Scottish Rites Freemasons to the sacred mushroom taking Jewish priests, the final rites and secrets were typically reserved for those that have both exceeded their ranks and reached this physical age. This is because it is believed that after the age of 32 a purported connection with a galactic consciousness is now possible, which perhaps originates from the Kabbalic teachings of the 32 possible paths of the Tree of Life.


0x0ss-85

esoteric

(adjective)
1. understood by or meant for only the select few who have special knowledge or interest; recondite:poetry full of esoteric allusions.
2. belonging to the select few.
3. private; secret; confidential.
4. (of a philosophical doctrine or the like) intended to be revealed only to the initiates of a group:

symbology

(noun)
1. the study of symbols.
2. the use of symbols; symbolism.

Now that you have some basic knowledge of the language of symbology, let us return to the lithograph we are going to interpret today. This particular lithograph comes from one of my all time favorite books, “The Secret Teachings of All Ages” by Manly Palmer Hall, an initiated adept of the 33rd degree Scottish Rites Masons. 

Back in the early part of the last century M.P Hall imparted an almost incomprehensible amount of beautifully articulated wisdom and knowledge in this monster of a book.

In this picture you can see the procession of the equinox or the Celestial stars and planets that move around us at approximately a 1600 to 2100 year pattern (as not all of the constellations are an even 30 degrees, some fall short and some exceed) leading up to the 26,000 year cycle of the processional equinox, or more approximately around 25,860 years or so (as our movement through the “viscosity” of space differs depending on where our galaxy is in proximity to its own movement through what we call space). For a better detailed explanation of this cycle, check out my all encompassing article here on the Maya 2012 calendar system which in reality, is a way to measure creation and the Procession of the Equinox.

Version 2
At the bottom left of the picture we can see Mohamed holding pages from the Koran with his left foot cast over a broken statue of a different deity, representing iconoclasm by overthrowing the representation of a rival or differing religion; showing the mentality of that particular theology which is that no deity is to be represented or depicted, an ironic bit of symbology considering Mohamed himself is being shown (which is forbidden according in the Koran).

 Version 2
Behind Mohamed is the Celestial Bull, signifying the constellation Taurus and the Galactic Super Wave which appears to come from between his horns; not coincidentally from the exact direction of the supermassive black hole (but more on that later when my book, “The Truth About Everything” releases at the end of the year).

This ancient depiction of the bull breaking open the egg of time also carries with it a much more literal meaning as Taurus begins the cycle of precession as it moves counterclockwise from the perspective of the Earth.

During the time of Taurus we saw a lot of sacrifice and hunter/gatherer mentality of civilization due to the rising and falling cycles of consciousness.

At the end of the Age of Taurus, Moses commanded the people whom still worshipped the “false idol” or golden depiction of the bull (Taurus) to kill themselves. This is because at the end of each 2100-ish year period of the Precession of the Equinox you are supposed to shed the ways and consciousness inherent with the previous Age.

To conclude, each Age is anthropomorphized into animals and human characters (so as to remain within the consciousness of man) the stories will at one point merge together to tell of the natural cycle of progression of mans consciousness throughout the Ages; a physical, demonstrable phenomena.

Version 2

A beautiful bit of esoteric information just in one small inch of the picture alone.

This is further illustrated as the symbols in the picture continues; on the bas relief to the lower right we can see the Pre-Christian solar deity Mithras (all of these esoteric symbols displayed predate Christianity btw) in his sacrificial killing of the Bull (which also has deeper significance of the ending of the Sun’s solar embodiment during mans time in the Age of Taurus.
Mithras slays the celestial bull during the fiducial marker point of the Vernal Equinox – when the North Star points eventually to a new constellation at the end of each Age, just as we saw last December 21, 2012.

The slaying of the celestial bull also is meant to show mankind’s resilience in surviving each of the natural cycles of the super wave as well as the influential cycles of precession.

Mithras also is shown with other members of the zodiac or anthropomorphized constellation figures that are each helping him to kill the sacred bull.

The Divine Serpent of knowledge (often seen as the aurorboros) which also signifies the timeless nature of things is beneath the relief, next to the serpent we can see the two twin dogs or the Dog Star Sirius and its binary twin (which is intentionally also drawn into the partial image of a lion to represent Leo).

Below to the left of Mithras is Cancer the crab, Scorpio, as well as the two Gemini twins to the left of Mithras and the torch of illumination to the right.

Version 2

 In the center stands the High Priest of Israel, holding The base of the seven branched candlestick _ the mosaic of symbol of the planetary governors of the world, or the 7 Chaldean planetary bodies that govern the internal and external influences and nature of man. 
Version 2

 To the left of the high priest is the Golden bull mentioned earlier standing atop of the symbol of our galaxy’s own brown dwarf star hidden partially by the large candle figure in the front for very obscure yet intentionally veiled meanings.

Version 2

Next to the Golden bull sits Jupiter Ammon, often seen as Zeus, holding this flaming lightning bolt with his horns set to represent his solar embodiment’s reign during the Age of Ram or Aires.

Jupiter as Ammon is also represented as Amon or Amman or Ommon ( as the vowels in Hebrew are interchangeable) and is most commonly uttered in praise or prayer still to this day veiled as a utterance of “let it be so” when people of almost all religions and language say this deities name when they say “Amen” at the end of prayer or when they sit to eat. Amen is also the solar deity of Egyptian times known as Ra, or Amen Ra.

Version 2

Above Jupiter/Aires/Ammon we see the four creatures of Ezekiel’s vision of the Apocalypse which surround the altar of the Book of Seven Seals and the sacrificial “lamb of god”.

Version 2

Above this we can see Krishna seated with his foot on the serpent of time, representing his dominion over time and the 7 stars above his head also represent his mastery of the 7 chakras and the Chaldean planetary bodies thought at the time to be the main influences of the inner and external nature of mankind.

Next to this is the most recent anthropomorphized solar deity, Jesus the Christos, whom is pointing past the clouds in the direction of a female version of Gabriel (I’ve heard in some retellings that Gabriel was a woman). Past the Gabriel figure is the pyramids of Egyptian initiation to this sort of information.

Version 2
Finally the picture ends ( there’s more but I covered the best parts) with the bull Apis crowned with a lunar globe and the Father Nile pouring out the source of the rivers (which also doubles as a zodiac reference to Aquarius, the Water Bearer, representing the Age of Enlightenment which comes after the three Ages depicted in this lithograph. 

These three Ages of the precession of the Equinox and their influence on consciousness are directly responsible for the religions that were created during each Age in response to the ascending cycle of consciousness. You can see this in the band of the zodiac in the upper left.

The band of the Zodiac, showing three of the previous Ages that are depicted in this lithograph and foreshadowing today's Age of Aquarius.

The band of the Zodiac, showing three of the previous Ages that are depicted in this lithograph and foreshadowing today’s Age of Aquarius.

First is the Taurus the bull when the cult of Mithras was in succession, next is Aires the Ram when the Hebrew faith sprang forth, and finally we have the two fish, the “Jesus fish” of the Age of Pisces which just ended after an almost 2100 year cycle on December 21, 2012. The Maya had their dates on point, their philosophies were just bastardized in recent times by mass media and ignorance.

Hopefully this was enlightening to some as much as it was fun for me to dissect and interpret. Look around you and check out the symbols and signs that surround us, chances are they were created to speak to influential levels of consciousness that you weren’t aware existed. Change your perspective, change your reality; open up your eyes and Life opens up with them.

Much love,

Eric Anthony Crew

makrokosm_i_mikrokosm


Gnostic Manly P Hall MEME

“Silence is the only language spacious enough to include everything and to keep us from slipping back into dualistic judgments and divisive words.” – Richard Rohr, Silence & Strain

Contemplations of Quietude

By Eric Anthony Crew

Continue reading

Understanding Our Local Cosmos

Understanding Our Local Cosmic Community

Continue reading


The War on Consciousness & Modern Warming

To understand the history of global warming is to understand the cycles of the Sun as well as to understand and observe the impedance of deceitful legislation on human development, proposed since the days of Margaret Thatcher, that would cause further hinderance to the wellbeing of humanity and the ecology alike. Do not get tricked into supporting legislation that will continue the lies and avoid the real truth of the matter; the current state of extreme weather and warming is caused by the Sun and not by trace gas elements.

A war on the consciousness is another way of saying there is a war on the perception of the way we see our Earth, as well as the Universe that surrounds it; which greatly impacts the wellbeing of all life on this planet and causes a great detriment in the physical and mental development of the human race.

the sun from space

Weather Wars Part 1: A Look Into The Facts & Fallacies of The Global Warming Fraud
By Eric Anthony Crew, originally written September 2011

By now everyone with a television or computer is familiar with the terms “global warming,” “going green,” and of course “carbon emissions,” but what do these words actually mean?The theory of global warming reaches as far back as the 1880’s according to historical record.  The natural conclusion of climate specialists was to factor in the impact of human evolution on the changing of the climate, but belief in this theory requires the omission of important data that must be incorporated to better understand the entire scope of this topic. The Earth has been in a cyclical pattern of heating and cooling for millennia and we need to look no further than our nearest star for the proof. The problem of global warming is not that we need to create more laws and restrictions, rather that we need to revise the entire structure of how we view this issue and its source cause.

The hypothesis of global warming began as one of many uncertain scientific hypotheses, specifically stating that the burning of fossil fuels would increase the CO2 levels in the atmosphere which would in turn enhance the greenhouse effect. The greenhouse effect was then calculated to create an exponential increase in temperature if CO2 emissions continued unimpeded. This hypothesis was regarded as unfounded for almost a hundred years in the scientific community because the original calculations from the 19th century indicated that the average global temperature should have risen more than 1° celsius by 1940, which did not happen.

As Prime Minister of the UK in 1979, Margaret Thatcher returned the hypothesis to the public and attempted to make it a major international policy issue. This issue would set the tone for years to come for all aspiring politicians, whether they believed in the theory or not, so as to not appear weak on protecting the environment. However, her reasons for doing so have come into scrutiny, as the 2008 ABC documentary, “The Great Global Warming Swindle” has described in great detail. Her position was a reflection of her political affiliation’s goal to endorse nuclear programs without international backlash. The way to accomplish this task was to alter the public perception of nuclear technology, which the UK’s Conservative Party desired for ulterior reasons. After the General Elections of 1979, the majority of the coming Cabinet members were former members of the government that lost to the campaigns sanctioned by the National Union of Mineworkers in 1974. The returning politicians sought then for any excuse for reducing the power of the coal industry and their forerunners. A solution came in the revelation that coal-powered stations gave off CO2, whereas nuclear power did not. Global warming contributed the perfect excuse for reducing the UK’s dependence on coal by replacing it with nuclear power.

nuclear_power_plant

That industry’s large nuclear processing facilities were also required for the proposed upgrade of the UK’s nuclear weapons program, which the rival Labour Party vehemently opposed. Yet, after the accidents at Chernobyl and Three-Mile Island, public opinion of nuclear technology was severely damaged. That and the privatization of the UK’s electric industry, which held stake in coal remaining the dominant energy source, disclosed the fact that nuclear electricity cost four times more than UK coal-fired electricity. Thus, global warming became the only remaining excuse for the unpopular nuclear power facilities needed for nuclear weapons.

Therefore, Mrs. Thatcher and her associates created the Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research, and the newly appointed councils were encouraged to place priority in garnering climate-related research. The Hadley Centre persisted as an influential component to this movement and later developed into the well-known and respected IPCC, or International Panel of Climate Control. All of the research and data compiled by these scientists have been funded directly from the government via public taxes. With economic systems beginning to wane, research funding began to lose importance to the public, but global warming remained as an important concern of  the world’s leading governments. Therefore whenever monetary support was needed, politicians would include fearful references to global warming if possible to scare the public into acceptance of further funding.

Understanding the history of global warming’s political influences is an important factor in balancing the views on how society should deal with legislation concerning waste and pollution. Superficially, the essence of global warming was an issue of environmental protection and saving the earth, and so the environmentalist and conservationist movements also began to endorse the effort to stop CO2 emissions. Public opinion was swayed from fear based rhetoric and thus man-made global warming was now the most influential international political topic of debate. The possibility of potential risk became undisputed “facts” in the form of proposed legislation to restrict CO2 emissions. It wasn’t until the Kyoto Summit in ’97 that we would see America truly jump aboard this issue, alongside UK political champion Tony Blair in proposing actions to have nation states commit to the limitations.

Global_Warming

The outcome of these legislations resulted in serious economic damage. The industrial and economic growth of any nation requires an abundance of available energy supply and whatever obstructs the supply and usage of energy will then reduce the economic exploits it is based upon. The governments were pressured to reduce their “carbon footprint” to nearly half of their emissions averaged in 1990.

However, there are those that believe that man is not the main cause of this change. To verify this claim, the rise and fall of atmospheric carbon dioxide levels as well as temperature change need to be observed and cross-examined with each hypothesis. Records of atmospheric levels of CO2 since 1940 show a continuous rise, but during this same time the global temperature decreased until 1975 when the temperatures began to rise again.  All models of greenhouse effect suggest a temperature increase indicates warming will be at its greatest for a given location in the troposphere and at its lowest near the surface of the earth. However, both NOAA and NASA’s websites release graphs showing that current satellite and weather balloon data do not support this model. Instead these empirical findings show that the surface warming rate is greater than or equal to the rate in the lower troposphere.

Another part of the theory of green house effects suggest that the Earth’s temperature will change in accordance to the increase or decrease in CO2 levels, however details released by NASA indicate data for the complete opposite. As the Earth cools the oceans begin to absorb carbon dioxide, and as the climate warms the oceans release carbon dioxide. Although because of the very large mass of the world’s oceans, it takes hundreds of years for global temperature changes to register with the oceanic mass. Thus, studies conducted by scientists at drilling stations in glaciers, such as the Vostok station, show changes in the level of atmospheric CO2 follow changes in global temperature at around every 800 years. This does not fit the government and media endorsed postulate that our recent Industrial Revolution is the cause of climate change.

greenhouse

To fully comprehend what comprises the theory of green-house effect we must also understand the catalysts for the argument, namely what CO2 really is and does. Carbon dioxide accounts for only about 0.054% of the Earth’s total atmosphere. The Earth’s atmosphere is but only one part of the total Biosphere, or all of the areas of living and non-living organisms within the Earth.  According to the American Institute of Physics, humans are responsible for less than 1% of that, or around 6.5 gigatons of emissions each year. While that number may sound staggering, these numbers pale in comparison to the 150 gigatons of emissions caused by other plants and animals annually. Decomposing leaves produce even more, volcanoes more than double the average emissions caused by man, and the ocean remains the largest producer of emissions in history. Therefore, collectively analyzing the data thus far indicates that man-made emissions alone cannot be causing global warming.

Even with all of this data being available to the public, there is still a majority of opinion that wants to believe in the notion that man is responsible for a sudden change in our global climate.To get a better idea of why this is, we must return to the panel of scientists that evolved from Margaret Thatcher’s Hadley Center, now known as the International Panel of Climate Control, or IPCC. By using the data findings released by the now infamous, “Fourth Assessment Report’s Working Group I Summary for Policymakers,” we can assess the opposition to this theory and where the relative science has led them. The report, which has been referred to in nearly every piece of global warming legislation since its release in 2007, finds that it is “very likely” that emissions of heat-trapping gases from human activities have caused “most of the observed increase in globally averaged temperatures since the mid-20th century.”

The United Nation panel, the IPCC’s “Fourth Assessment Report’s Working Group I Summary for Policymakers” combines certain scientific understanding of global warming and then predicts what the climate changes will be in the future if not maintained. The Working Group I included the input of more than, “1,200 authors and 2,500 scientific expert reviewers from more than 130 countries.”  The report concludes that it is irrefutable that Earth’s average temperature is rising exponentially, stating that it is proven from what is “now evident from observations of increases in global average air and ocean temperatures, widespread melting of snow and ice, and rising global mean sea level.” The report also concludes that the two most important heat-trapping gases, carbon dioxide and methane, “exceeds by far the natural range over the last 650,000 years.” Finally naming that the industrial revolution is the prime source for the start of this cycle which is “very likely to have been unprecedented in more than 10,000 years.” Other important points expressed by this report claim that 11 of the last 12 years rank among the 12 hottest years on record and that in the last 50 years, “cold days, cold nights, and frost have become less frequent, while hot days, hot nights, and heat waves have become more frequent.”

ipcc-chart-web

This is all very compelling information if only examined in itself, especially if not double-verified which is what is supposed to be attempted in accordance to the Scientific Method. To re-examine the above claims by the IPCC, we should also evaluate their disclaimer made directly under the aforementioned information. The scientists, after quite a lot of controversy in the refutations of certain findings, decide to create an addendum for their use of the word “likely,” even going so far as to create a graph of what “likely” entails. When the IPCC associates the word “likely” to a scientific finding, the term is merely a reflection of a specific range of certainty as defined by a chart on their own homepage, therefore it is not a Universal truth if they create the definition of their information.

To dissect the data released by the IPCC was a complete career killer for both politicians and scientists alike, whom would receive no further support if public statements or questions were made. This continued until the release of the leaked emails and subsequent book entitled, “Climategate,” by Brian Sussman. The “Documents” folder in the enormous data-file released by a whistleblower within the IPCC contains many segments of computer program code used by the IPCC that indicates intentional doctoring of the Climate Research Unit’s global temperature series. The data-file also contained a 15,000-line commentary by programmers concerned that the code and the data used by the scientists were fabricated to substantiate their original hypotheses. In one section titled “seldom-tidy code,” the immense number of filtering, processing and altering programs used on the raw data is unsettling at the least. Alterations that were so blatant included the removal of proxy data that inadequately correlated the measured regional temperatures, and even showed a complete replacement of proxy data altogether with forgeries to conceal the discrepancies between what the proxy data actually showed and what the IPCC wanted it to show.

Within the emails, The team’s programmers even admitted that they were artificially adjusting or “correcting” the proxy data from tree-rings. In the “tech world,” a programmer’s comment following data produced by mathematical algorithms is usually preceded by the statement “REM” for “remark,” indicating that the text on the line following the word “REM” should be ignored by the data collector that compiled the research at a later time. One of the remarks most often included in the program fragments disclosed by the whistleblower stated, “REM Uses ‘corrected’ MXD [proxy data from tree-rings] – but shouldn’t usually plot past 1960 because these will be artificially adjusted to look closer to the real temperatures.” Even going so far as to continue by saying, “These will be artificially adjusted to look closer to the real temperatures.” These are statements made by the authority on the subject of global warming, with an admission that the data are being routinely tampered with for the sake of making the proxy data comparable to the instrumental temperatures.

global_warming_hoax

In one of the most revealing and controversial emails leaked, Professor Phil Jones of the CRU wrote to the authors of the highly popularized “hockey-stick” graph used in many arguments supporting the global warming hypothesis like the documentary, “An Inconvenient Truth.” In the emails the authors of this graph, Michael Mann, Raymond Bradley and Malcolm Hughes, admitted to falsely abolishing the medieval warm period to continue with current beliefs. Professor Jones wrote, “I’ve just completed Mike’s Nature trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years (ie from 1981 onwards) and from 1961 for Keith’s to hide the decline.” These are statements made by the chosen experts on the subject of global warming, showing they are at least perverting their findings, which is fraudulent and should be addressed as such. It is disconcerting to think of all the time, energy, and money that has been wasted just to support hypothesis that, when examining every supporting claim, falls short and even contradicts itself.

The National Academy of Sciences report reaffirmed the existence of the Medieval Warm Period between 900 A.D. and 1300 A.D. and period that followed called the “Little Ice Age” of around 1500 to 1850. Both of these periods occurred long before the invention of the sport’s utility vehicles or the industrial activity that could have possibly impacted the Earth’s climate. In fact, current research shows that the Medieval Warm Period saw the Earth to be much warmer than today and going so far as to claim the Vikings even were able to grow crops in Greenland.

The manipulation of public opinion and funding aside, there has been some positive changes that have occurred thanks to this global myth. People have become more responsible in their daily contribution toward the pollution of our planet. Even though our carbon emissions are not enough to cause the claims of catastrophic and irreversible events, it only benefits the Earth and it’s inhabitants to limit our waste potential. We all share the same air, water and earth on this planet and would be wise to continue to understand that there is always a reaction equal to or greater than the cause of an event. Yet that does not merit the manipulation of the world’s citizens into believing a theory for the sake of legislation and carbon taxes alone.

There are over thirty-one thousand scientists that disagree with the UN’s global warming claims by the Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine (OISM), released by the National Post, which proves once and for all that this is not a view shared only by an uneducated populace. In fact, each of the 31,000 scientists have signed a petition rejecting claims of human-caused global warming. The claim by most media-fed propaganda that only a “few conspiracy theorists” refuse to believe in the myth of man-made global warming completely contradicts the “31,072 Americans with university degrees in science – including 9,021 PhD’s” that signed the petition. The world needs accurate reporting on scientific claims, as well as accountable representatives as the figure heads for the experts that we are to rely on. By allowing legislation to be passed based on faulty, inaccurate and intentionally misleading information we are allowing ourselves to be manipulated into whatever laws will best suit the political endorsers of this claim.

CONCLUSION

The world now needs new representatives and experts to trust, ones that will base their new research on all of the sides of the issue and without the omission of data that detracts from proposed taxes. By revising our view on the cause of global warming, from the byproduct of the dangerous machinations of man to that of a cyclical process inherent in nature, we will be creating a future free of fear-based propaganda and misinformation. Mankind should continue to limit his contribution of detrimental pollution for the betterment of all living creatures and not for the propositions that will end up only benefiting of a handful of wealthy elitists. The Earth will continue to have cycles of rising and falling temperature and CO2 and in discovering this to be fact we need to correct our perspective regarding our personal impact on global warming.

Now that the political history has been explained we can continue the examination with Part 2 of “The Weather Wars – The Chemtrail Experiment” before ending this 3 part series with the evidence for the actual cause of global warming and cooling; the waxing and waning of the cycles of the Sun in the article, “It’s The Sun Stupid! How Solar Cycles, Solar Flares, & CME’s Cause the Extreme Weather on Earth”, (a semi-literary response to the Bloomberg Businessweek propaganda article, “It’s Global Warming Stupid!”

Eric Anthony Crew

.
.
.

AP UPDATE: Free EBook/PDF Downloads

.
.
.

Screen shot 2013-06-07 at 9.23.53 AM

Click The Above Picture to Download A Copy of Daniel Crew’s, “Man Made Global Warming? Watch Your Wallet!”

Of the reference material used; the first and most inspirational for myself was when reading my father’s short paper entailing the nearly laughable sciences behind Global Warming. This paper inspired the above essay, available for free download is Daniel Anthony Crew’s “Man Made Global Warming? Watch Your Wallet!

“Today’s global warming is part of a natural 1,500-year, plus or minus 500-year, solar cycle operating for at least a million years. The Earth’s climate has warmed and cooled nine times in the past 12,000 years, in lock step with the waxing and waning of the sun’s magnetic activity (Science 2001;294[7 December]:2130-2136). Over the last 1,200 years there has been a “Medieval Warming” (900-1300), when Greenland was green; a “Little Ice Age” (1300-1850), when New York harbor froze, and people could walk from Manhattan across the ice to Staten Island a mile away (in 1780); and the current global warming (1850-?). Rather than “global warming,” a better term for this phase of the solar cycle is “Modern Warming.” Since 1850, temperatures have risen 0.8 degrees C, most rapidly in 1850-1870 and 1920-1940. Temperatures in the 1,500-year solar cycle fluctuate within a 4 degree C range – two degrees above and two degrees below the norm.

The Modern Warming is not confined to this planet. Mars, Jupiter, Pluto, and Triton (Neptune’s largest moon) in the solar system are also warming.” – Daniel Crew

Screen shot 2013-05-16 at 12.29.24 PM

Click the above picture to download a free copy of, “Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!”

The scandal that blew the lid of the “science” behind this global scam. Indisputable proof these scientists have been faking evidence for years. A must have and as always, free to download from my 4Shared page here, “Climategate: Caught Green-Handed!

Large PDF Breakdown of Time Table for Climate Gate Events

Click to download – Large PDF Breakdown of Time Table for Climate Gate Events

 

Click to download – Large PDF Breakdown of Time Table for Climate Gate Events

.
.
.

Screen shot 2013-06-07 at 2.41.56 PM

Shredding the “climate consensus” myth: More Than 1000 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims – Challenge UN IPCC & Gore

.
.
.

A STORY OF INTRIGUE, DECEPTION AND SECRECY

“On November 17, 2009 some 3,000 e-mails, software files, and other documents from the University of East Anglia’s Climatic Research Unit were covertly released onto the Internet. In his November 28, 2009 telegraph.co.uk article “Climate Change: This is the Worst Scientific Scandal of Our Generation,” Christopher Booker summarized the far-reaching ramifications of what was exposed in these emails….”

.
.
.

Causes of global temperature changes during the 19th and 20th centuries

.
.
.

Global Warming Is Media-Hyped Hysteria
by James M. Inhofe. At Issue: Is Global Warming a Threat?

.
.
.

http://youtu.be/S8F7jx4H36M

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S8F7jx4H36M&feature=youtu.be

April 21, 2011 marks the one-year anniversary of the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) First Light press conference, where NASA revealed the first images taken by the spacecraft.

In the last year, the sun has gone from its quietest period in years to the activity marking the beginning of solar cycle 24. SDO has captured every moment with a level of detail never-before possible. The mission has returned unprecedented images of solar flares, eruptions of prominences, and the early stages of coronal mass ejections (CME’s). In this video are some of the most beautiful, interesting, and mesmerizing events seen by SDO during its first year.


“We check the main predictions of the climate models against the best and latest data. Fortunately the climate models got all their major predictions wrong. Why? Every serious skeptical scientist has been consistently saying essentially the same thing for over 20 years, yet most people have never heard the message. Here it is, put simply enough for any lay reader willing to pay attention…”

The Songs of the Spheres

IntoThePixel-2009-Craft_Cosmos

Songs of the Spheres: A Precessional Poem

by Eric Crew

As the sky pours out the heavens and the stars begin to fall,

When our days become much shorter and our words have grown too tall.

A forgetful trend of bitterness; our History that’s ensued, The stars will start their game again, the pieces have been renewed.

The Suns set soon upon the board; two Kings are all but left, Our minds yet turn to other things, more pressing than of this theft.

For the pawns have all retreated, our Time now put to test, In Space a tone has sounded; the Storm that follows rest.

Change will come chaotically and not at all as planned, With knowledge of these changes; the seers seen as damned.

At least by eyes untrained to see the truth of days that passed, But recognition is self-evident and with it happens fast;

The consciousness of duality, with its void laid bare to see, Which cocreates reality; which in turn will set you free.

Continue reading

Do Not Follow – Zen Poetry

Do Not Follow

Zen Poetry.

Do not follow me;

Each step you take in my direction,

will be a step further away from yourself.

Do not listen to what I say;

My language is my own and will,

always be best understood by myself alone.

Do not think I need praise;

I am a King among Kings,

and the humblest of slaves.

Eric Anthony Crew

Eric Anthony Crew

September, 12 2011


My “GOD” Theorem

“Question with boldness even the existence of a god; because if there be one he must approve of the homage of reason more than that of blindfolded fear.” – Thomas Jefferson

Discussions, theories and discourses on religion or theological aspects are rarely clear or cut and dry; if they were, many of us would each be in agreement with the same  idea or theory thereof. That being stated, I would like to write out my own theory for why there is only one entity that some call “god” and my supporting thesis as to why we are all part of this same entity.

God (or fill in the “___” with your own desired nomenclature) is only capable of being ONE physical entity; meaning there is only ONE source for everything.

There is a great story that I will paraphrase for my use in explaining the perspective that most of us begin with; which is the idea of rejecting infinite regress, meaning that one does not believe in time as an endless stream, which would demand a “cause” & “effect” and “beginning” & end”.

Two Greek philosophers were curious about Atlas, the deity charged with holding the great weight of the world upon his shoulders.

As the one philosopher queried, “If Atlas holds up the Earth, what holds up Atlas?”

To which the other philosopher answered, “Well that’s simple my friend, Atlas is standing upon the back of a giant tortoise shell.”

At this the first man pondered for a moment and then asked again, “But then what does that tortoise stand on?”

As if anticipating this question the philosopher smiled and said, “Why, my good man! Its tortoises all the way down!”

I believe in the rejection of infinite regress is incorrect and that time is really just an illusion caused in part by our dualistic perspective and the necessity of mass adhering to the vibrational frequency of our third dimensional constructs. This partly explains why the greatest minds of our time and were never able to get past the issues of “time”, “god”, or the “Big-Bang” in most philosophical contexts – nor were they able to fully convince others of their ideas either.

So; if we are to accept that “time” is merely a fallacy demanded by our need to measure the immeasurable and that there is no true beginning nor end to anything (think of the very pertinent looping shape of the infinity symbol) we are finally able to let go of the largest hurdles in contemplating the divine. Continuing with this pattern of thought, let us also then accept the postulation that time is not inherent in the Universe and so there never was a beginning to “God” nor will there be an end. By accepting this we are able to somewhat fix the problems we have when trying to explain the origins of the Universe; as we always get caught up on the beginning of things.

“A twisted ring of gas, one that stretches more than 600 light-years across the heart of the Milky Way galaxy, has been discovered by astronomers using the powerful infrared Herschel space telescope. The gaseous ring, which gives birth to new stars, has a kink in the middle, such that it looks like a cosmic infinity symbol.” SPACE.com

Moving on from this we now have to assume that there is a FIRST source, or a FIRST MOVER, or God if you will (that which is unmoved by others, uncontrolled by others and thus not contingent upon the existence of anything other than itself) … and so now there is 1.

From this 1 (“god”) we get everything.The proof of this is the idea that “god” made us all from itself; if you can accept the above postulation; then you must also believe that “god” was/is the only and first entity that had to use its own fabric/self to create everything else. If this was not the case then we would instead have 2 original entities; “god” and the “fabric” or the material from which “god” created all forms of life. If there were 2 original entities (god & the fabric), we would the have to reject infinite regress again because something would have had to have “made” the fabric and “god” or one to have come before the other; which again would not make sense within the parameters of infinite regress.

Therefore, “god”, or the Source, must have made all forms of life, matter and frequencies from its own material; else again there would have been two sources. Thus we now have a passable explanation for the idea that there not only a first source – often referred to as God – but that we are all made of this being and thus… are all god.


Eric Anthony Crew

%d bloggers like this: